Head-to-head evidence
fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol vs fluticasone propionate
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Asthma
Shared mechanism: Glucocorticoid receptor · full Asthma pipeline
fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol · Trelegy Ellipta
Marketed by GlaxoSmithKline
NCT02924688 · Phase 3 · completed
This was a large (N=2,436) randomized, triple-blind, active-controlled Phase III trial comparing four fixed-dose combinations of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol against two fluticasone furoate/vilanterol dual therapy controls in patients with inadequately controlled asthma. The primary endpoint, change from baseline in trough FEV1 at Week 24, was met for every pre-specified triple-therapy versus dual-therapy comparison, with all four least-squares mean differences favoring triple therapy and p<0.001. The combination of randomization, blinding, an active comparator, a large sample, a hard clinical endpoint, and a statistically significant primary result constitutes strong evidence.
Next expected readout: January 2027 · NCT05757102 (registry estimate)
fluticasone propionate
Marketed by GlaxoSmithKline
NCT00920959 · Phase 3 · completed
The study was randomized and double-blind, included 908 participants, and compared fluticasone-based treatments with placebo. However, its primary measure was a pulmonary-function surrogate rather than a hard clinical or endoscopic outcome, and the registry does not report whether the primary comparison was met.
Next expected readout: September 2027 · NCT07664527 (registry estimate)
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol's landscape · fluticasone propionate's landscape