Head-to-head evidence
Aflibercept vs RGX-314
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Shared mechanism: VEGF-A · full Age-Related Macular Degeneration pipeline
Aflibercept · Eylea
Marketed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and partners
NCT00509795 · Phase 3 · completed
The trial randomly assigned 1,217 participants and used quadruple blinding with ranibizumab as an active comparator. Its hard clinical primary endpoint—maintaining vision at week 52—met the prespecified non-inferiority criterion for all three aflibercept regimens, supporting a strong evidence grade.
Next expected readout: December 2026 · NCT06856577 (registry estimate)
RGX-314
Developed by REGENXBIO Inc.
NCT04832724 · Phase 2 · completed
The study enrolled 60 participants into sequential RGX-314 dose and formulation groups without randomization, blinding, or a comparator arm. Its primary endpoint was the surrogate pharmacodynamic measure of RGX-314 protein concentration, and no primary outcome results are available.
Next expected readout: December 2026 · NCT04704921 (registry estimate)
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: Aflibercept's landscape · RGX-314's landscape