Head-to-head evidence
Teneligliptin vs Yogliptin
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Type 2 Diabetes
Shared mechanism: DPP-4 · full Type 2 Diabetes pipeline
Teneligliptin · Tenelia
Developed by Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma
NCT00974090 · Phase 3 · completed
The trial was properly randomized and double-blinded with a placebo control and a real hard clinical endpoint (HbA1c change), and enrollment (~96-98 per arm) was reasonable for a 12-week phase 3 add-on study. However, the posted results report only least-squares mean changes with standard errors and no explicit statistical significance test for the primary comparison, so while the numeric difference favors teneligliptin, whether it formally met its pre-specified endpoint cannot be confirmed from this record alone.
Yogliptin
Developed by Chengdu Easton Biopharmaceuticals
NCT05318326 · Phase 3 · status unknown
The trial randomly assigns patients to Yogliptin or a matching placebo and blinds patients, care providers, investigators and outcome assessors alike, using HbA1c change, the standard regulator-accepted measure for diabetes drugs, as its main result. Results have not been posted yet, so whether Yogliptin lowered blood sugar significantly more than placebo is not yet known.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: Teneligliptin's landscape · Yogliptin's landscape