Head-to-head evidence
Teneligliptin vs Vildagliptin
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Type 2 Diabetes
Shared mechanism: DPP-4 · full Type 2 Diabetes pipeline
Teneligliptin · Tenelia
Developed by Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma
NCT00974090 · Phase 3 · completed
The trial was properly randomized and double-blinded with a placebo control and a real hard clinical endpoint (HbA1c change), and enrollment (~96-98 per arm) was reasonable for a 12-week phase 3 add-on study. However, the posted results report only least-squares mean changes with standard errors and no explicit statistical significance test for the primary comparison, so while the numeric difference favors teneligliptin, whether it formally met its pre-specified endpoint cannot be confirmed from this record alone.
Vildagliptin · Galvus
Developed by Novartis
NCT00099866 · Phase 3 · completed
The study was randomized and double-blind, with an active metformin comparator and 570 participants. Its primary endpoint was the surrogate measure of HbA1c change, and because no trial results are posted, it cannot be determined whether the primary comparison was favorable.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: Teneligliptin's landscape · Vildagliptin's landscape