Head-to-head evidence
SP2086 vs Teneligliptin
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Type 2 Diabetes
Shared mechanism: DPP-4 · full Type 2 Diabetes pipeline
SP2086
Developed by Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals
NCT01970033 · Phase 3 · status unknown
This is a large, randomized, quadruple-blind, placebo-controlled trial using the standard glycemic control measure for diabetes as its primary endpoint, but no results have been posted yet, so whether the drug lowered HbA1c more than placebo is unknown. (Independently confirmed by a second model, in-session-confirm:claude-opus-20260822.)
Teneligliptin · Tenelia
Developed by Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma
NCT00974090 · Phase 3 · completed
The trial was properly randomized and double-blinded with a placebo control and a real hard clinical endpoint (HbA1c change), and enrollment (~96-98 per arm) was reasonable for a 12-week phase 3 add-on study. However, the posted results report only least-squares mean changes with standard errors and no explicit statistical significance test for the primary comparison, so while the numeric difference favors teneligliptin, whether it formally met its pre-specified endpoint cannot be confirmed from this record alone.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: SP2086's landscape · Teneligliptin's landscape