Head-to-head evidence
cagrilintide vs eloralintide
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Obesity
Shared mechanism: Amylin receptor · full Obesity pipeline
cagrilintide
Developed by Novo Nordisk
NCT03856047 · Phase 2 · completed
The trial randomized participants to five active doses, a pooled placebo, and an active liraglutide comparator arm, with quadruple-blinding (participant, care provider, investigator, and outcomes assessor all masked) and roughly 100 participants per arm. The primary endpoint, percent change in body weight at 26 weeks, is the regulator-accepted physiological measure for obesity trials, and every cagrilintide dose showed a statistically significant weight-loss advantage over placebo (p-values ranging from 0.0002 to <.0001), so the primary comparison was clearly met in the favorable direction.
Next expected readout: January 2027 · NCT07411560 (registry estimate)
eloralintide
Developed by Eli Lilly
NCT06230523 · Phase 2 · completed
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 in obesity and overweight (263 participants). Week-48 body-weight reductions ranged from 9.4% to 20.1% across eloralintide doses versus 0.4% on placebo, a separation many times larger than the reported error margins; percent change in body weight is the accepted registrational endpoint in obesity.
Next expected readout: December 2026 · NCT07738614 (registry estimate)
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: cagrilintide's landscape · eloralintide's landscape