Head-to-head evidence
AT278 vs IcoSema
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Type 2 Diabetes
Shared mechanism: Insulin receptor (basal) · full Type 2 Diabetes pipeline
AT278
Developed by Arecor Limited
NCT05754424 · Phase 1 · completed
Every participant received AT278 and the active comparator insulin in random order, with neither participants nor staff knowing which was given at each visit, which is a solid design. But the trial measured a pharmacology lab readout rather than a real-world blood sugar or complication outcome. Registry results were not posted at the time of grading; the key result shown was recovered from the cited external source.
IcoSema · Kyinsu
Marketed by Novo Nordisk
NCT05352815 · Phase 3 · completed
Participants were randomized 1:1 to IcoSema or active insulin icodec, but the study was open-label rather than blinded. The primary HbA1c endpoint was statistically significantly better with IcoSema, although HbA1c is a surrogate metabolic measure rather than a hard clinical endpoint.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: AT278's landscape · IcoSema's landscape