Head-to-head evidence
amycretin vs VCT220
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Obesity
Shared mechanism: GLP-1 receptor · full Obesity pipeline
amycretin
Developed by Novo Nordisk
NCT06064006 · Phase 2 · completed
The study was randomized, quadruple-masked, and placebo-controlled, with 125 participants, providing a meaningful controlled design. Registry results were not posted at the time of grading; the key result shown was recovered from the cited external source.
This trial's registered primary endpoint was safety (treatment-emergent adverse events); the figures shown are its prespecified secondary weight-change endpoints as published in The Lancet.
Next expected readout: December 2027 · NCT07587710 (registry estimate)
VCT220
Developed by Ji Xing Pharmaceuticals (CORXEL) under a licence from Vincentage Pharma
NCT06569355 · Phase 2 · completed
This Phase 2 trial randomly assigned 250 people with obesity or overweight to one of several VCT220 doses or placebo, with participants, carers, investigators and outcome assessors unaware of assignment. The primary measure was percentage change in body weight at week 16. Weight fell by between 5.8% and 9.7% across the VCT220 dose groups against 1.6% on placebo, with reductions of 9.7% and 9.4% at the two 160 mg schedules (p of 0.001 or lower).
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: amycretin's landscape · VCT220's landscape