Head-to-head evidence
Alogliptin vs Yogliptin
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Type 2 Diabetes
Shared mechanism: DPP-4 · full Type 2 Diabetes pipeline
Alogliptin · Nesina
Marketed by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
NCT00286429 · Phase 3 · completed
The 390-participant trial was randomized, quadruple-blind, and placebo-controlled, with 130, 131, and 129 participants assigned to placebo, alogliptin 12.5 mg, and alogliptin 25 mg, respectively. Both primary HbA1c comparisons were statistically significant in favor of alogliptin, but HbA1c is a surrogate measure, so the evidence does not establish a strong clinical-outcome grade.
Next expected readout: December 2026 · NCT07093476 (registry estimate)
Yogliptin
Developed by Chengdu Easton Biopharmaceuticals
NCT05318326 · Phase 3 · status unknown
The trial randomly assigns patients to Yogliptin or a matching placebo and blinds patients, care providers, investigators and outcome assessors alike, using HbA1c change, the standard regulator-accepted measure for diabetes drugs, as its main result. Results have not been posted yet, so whether Yogliptin lowered blood sugar significantly more than placebo is not yet known.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: Alogliptin's landscape · Yogliptin's landscape