Head-to-head evidence
Alogliptin vs Gosogliptin
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Type 2 Diabetes
Shared mechanism: DPP-4 · full Type 2 Diabetes pipeline
Alogliptin · Nesina
Marketed by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
NCT00286429 · Phase 3 · completed
The 390-participant trial was randomized, quadruple-blind, and placebo-controlled, with 130, 131, and 129 participants assigned to placebo, alogliptin 12.5 mg, and alogliptin 25 mg, respectively. Both primary HbA1c comparisons were statistically significant in favor of alogliptin, but HbA1c is a surrogate measure, so the evidence does not establish a strong clinical-outcome grade.
Next expected readout: December 2026 · NCT07093476 (registry estimate)
Gosogliptin
Developed by SatRx
NCT03088670 · Phase 3 · completed
The study used randomization and an active comparator, but it was open-label and its primary endpoint was change in HbA1c, a surrogate measure rather than a hard clinical outcome. Registry results were not posted at the time of grading; the key result shown was recovered from the cited external source.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: Alogliptin's landscape · Gosogliptin's landscape