Head-to-head evidence
Alogliptin vs DBPR108
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Type 2 Diabetes
Shared mechanism: DPP-4 · full Type 2 Diabetes pipeline
Alogliptin · Nesina
Marketed by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
NCT00286429 · Phase 3 · completed
The 390-participant trial was randomized, quadruple-blind, and placebo-controlled, with 130, 131, and 129 participants assigned to placebo, alogliptin 12.5 mg, and alogliptin 25 mg, respectively. Both primary HbA1c comparisons were statistically significant in favor of alogliptin, but HbA1c is a surrogate measure, so the evidence does not establish a strong clinical-outcome grade.
Next expected readout: December 2026 · NCT07093476 (registry estimate)
DBPR108
Developed by CSPC Pharmaceutical Group
NCT04161430 · Phase 3 · completed
In this randomized, quadruple-blind, placebo- and active-controlled Phase 3 trial, 766 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to DBPR108, sitagliptin, or placebo. DBPR108 reduced HbA1c significantly more than placebo at 24 weeks, with a treatment difference whose confidence interval excluded no effect.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: Alogliptin's landscape · DBPR108's landscape