Head-to-head evidence
LY900014 vs SAR341402
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Type 2 Diabetes
Shared mechanism: Insulin receptor (basal) · full Type 2 Diabetes pipeline
LY900014 · Lyumjev
Marketed by Eli Lilly
NCT03214380 · Phase 3 · completed
The study randomized and double-blinded participants to LY900014 or insulin lispro, with 933 enrolled and approximately 336-337 participants in the main comparison arms. The primary HbA1c endpoint met the prespecified non-inferiority margin, but HbA1c is a laboratory surrogate rather than a hard clinical endpoint, supporting a moderate evidence grade.
SAR341402
Marketed by Sanofi
NCT03211858 · Phase 3 · completed
The trial randomized 597 participants to SAR341402 or active-control NovoLog/NovoRapid, but treatment assignment was not blinded. The primary HbA1c endpoint met the prespecified non-inferiority margins, while HbA1c is a surrogate measure, so the evidence is considered moderate rather than strong.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: LY900014's landscape · SAR341402's landscape