Head-to-head evidence
Lurasidone vs Milsaperidone (VHX-896)
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Schizophrenia
Shared mechanism: Dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT2A receptors (antagonist) · full Schizophrenia pipeline
Lurasidone
Marketed by Sumitomo Pharma
NCT00549718 · Phase 3 · completed
The study randomized approximately 500 participants to lurasidone 40, 80, or 120 mg or placebo and used quadruple masking of participants, clinicians, investigators, and outcome assessors. Its clinical primary endpoint, change in total PANSS score over 6 weeks, favored lurasidone overall versus placebo and was statistically significant (p<0.05).
Milsaperidone (VHX-896)
Marketed by Vanda Pharmaceuticals
NCT06494397 · Phase 1 · completed
Every participant in this trial received both VHX-896 and iloperidone, just in a different order, so there is no separate group that shows what happens without VHX-896, and nobody was blinded to which drug was being given at each stage. The trial measured drug levels in the blood to compare the two products, not any change in psychiatric symptoms, and results have not been posted yet.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: Lurasidone's landscape · Milsaperidone (VHX-896)'s landscape