Head-to-head evidence
liraglutide vs ZT002
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Obesity
Shared mechanism: GLP-1 receptor · full Obesity pipeline
liraglutide · Saxenda / Victoza
Marketed by Novo Nordisk
NCT00781937 · Phase 3 · completed
The trial randomly assigned 212 participants to liraglutide and 210 to placebo in a double-blind, placebo-controlled design, with objective body-weight outcomes assessed at week 56. All three prespecified primary comparisons favored liraglutide and were statistically significant (each p<0.0001), supporting a strong evidence grade.
Next expected readout: December 2026 · NCT07225816 (registry estimate)
ZT002
Developed by Beijing QL Biopharmaceutical
NCT07020884 · Phase 2 · completed
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial (n=303) in adults with overweight or obesity found that ZT002 produced significantly greater weight loss than placebo at 24 weeks across all doses tested, up to 14.4% versus 2.4% with placebo (p<0.0001).
Caveat: this result is taken from a company announcement or a news report of one, not from the trial registry or a peer-reviewed publication. Treat the figures as the sponsor's own statement, not as independently verified evidence.
Next expected readout: December 2026 · NCT07443059 (registry estimate)
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: liraglutide's landscape · ZT002's landscape