Head-to-head evidence
liraglutide vs SAL0150
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Type 2 Diabetes
Shared mechanism: GLP-1 receptor · full Type 2 Diabetes pipeline
liraglutide · Saxenda / Victoza
Marketed by Novo Nordisk
NCT00318461 · Phase 3 · completed
This was a large (n=1091), randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial with both a placebo-controlled comparison (liraglutide + metformin vs metformin + liraglutide placebo) and an active-controlled comparison (glimepiride + metformin). The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c at week 26, a hard, regulator-accepted outcome for type 2 diabetes. The prespecified primary comparisons for liraglutide 1.2 mg and 1.8 mg/day were met: both were significantly superior to metformin alone (p<0.0001) and non-inferior to glimepiride + metformin within the 0.4% margin. The 0.6 mg dose was superior to metformin but did not meet non-inferiority against glimepiride + metformin, which does not negate the positive results for the clinically relevant doses.
Next expected readout: June 2027 · NCT03883412 (registry estimate)
SAL0150
Developed by Shenzhen Salubris Pharmaceuticals
NCT05782192 · Phase 3 · completed
The study was randomized, quadruple-masked, and included both active and placebo comparator groups, with 458 participants. Its primary endpoint was the surrogate measure of HbA1c change. Registry results were not posted at the time of grading; the key result shown was recovered from the cited external source.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: liraglutide's landscape · SAL0150's landscape