Head-to-head evidence
HDG1901 vs SAL0150
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Type 2 Diabetes
Shared mechanism: GLP-1 receptor · full Type 2 Diabetes pipeline
HDG1901
Developed by Hangzhou Zhongmei Huadong Pharmaceutical
NCT06739044 · Phase 3 · completed
The trial randomized 494 participants to HDG1901 or active Ozempic treatment, but neither participants nor investigators were blinded. Its primary endpoint was change in HbA1c, a surrogate measure, and the registry does not report whether the comparison met its objective, supporting a moderate evidence grade.
Caveat: source is secondary industry coverage that does not cite the trial registry number; attribution rests on sponsor/program match only.
SAL0150
Developed by Shenzhen Salubris Pharmaceuticals
NCT05782192 · Phase 3 · completed
The study was randomized, quadruple-masked, and included both active and placebo comparator groups, with 458 participants. Its primary endpoint was the surrogate measure of HbA1c change. Registry results were not posted at the time of grading; the key result shown was recovered from the cited external source.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: HDG1901's landscape · SAL0150's landscape