Head-to-head evidence
HDG1901 vs HSK7653
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Type 2 Diabetes
Shared mechanism: GLP-1 receptor · full Type 2 Diabetes pipeline
HDG1901
Developed by Hangzhou Zhongmei Huadong Pharmaceutical
NCT06739044 · Phase 3 · completed
The trial randomized 494 participants to HDG1901 or active Ozempic treatment, but neither participants nor investigators were blinded. Its primary endpoint was change in HbA1c, a surrogate measure, and the registry does not report whether the comparison met its objective, supporting a moderate evidence grade.
Caveat: source is secondary industry coverage that does not cite the trial registry number; attribution rests on sponsor/program match only.
HSK7653
Developed by Haisco Pharmaceutical Group
NCT04556851 · Phase 3 · completed
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 476 patients and measured change in HbA1c, a standard efficacy measure in diabetes, at 24 weeks. Both HSK7653 doses lowered HbA1c significantly more than placebo (p<0.0001), meeting the trial's primary goal.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: HDG1901's landscape · HSK7653's landscape