Head-to-head evidence
HDG1901 vs HRS-7535
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Type 2 Diabetes
Shared mechanism: GLP-1 receptor · full Type 2 Diabetes pipeline
HDG1901
Developed by Hangzhou Zhongmei Huadong Pharmaceutical
NCT06739044 · Phase 3 · completed
The trial randomized 494 participants to HDG1901 or active Ozempic treatment, but neither participants nor investigators were blinded. Its primary endpoint was change in HbA1c, a surrogate measure, and the registry does not report whether the comparison met its objective, supporting a moderate evidence grade.
Caveat: source is secondary industry coverage that does not cite the trial registry number; attribution rests on sponsor/program match only.
HRS-7535
Developed by Kailera Therapeutics under a licence from Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals
NCT06672172 · Phase 3 · completed
This is a well-designed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a recognized clinical measure (HbA1c change) as its primary endpoint. Registry results were not posted at the time of grading; the key result shown was recovered from the cited external source.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: HDG1901's landscape · HRS-7535's landscape