Head-to-head evidence
fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol vs PT001
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Asthma
Shared mechanism: Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M3) · full Asthma pipeline
fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol · Trelegy Ellipta
Marketed by GlaxoSmithKline
NCT02924688 · Phase 3 · completed
This was a large (N=2,436) randomized, triple-blind, active-controlled Phase III trial comparing four fixed-dose combinations of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol against two fluticasone furoate/vilanterol dual therapy controls in patients with inadequately controlled asthma. The primary endpoint, change from baseline in trough FEV1 at Week 24, was met for every pre-specified triple-therapy versus dual-therapy comparison, with all four least-squares mean differences favoring triple therapy and p<0.001. The combination of randomization, blinding, an active comparator, a large sample, a hard clinical endpoint, and a statistically significant primary result constitutes strong evidence.
Next expected readout: January 2027 · NCT05757102 (registry estimate)
PT001
Developed by AstraZeneca
NCT03358147 · Phase 2/3 · completed
The study was randomized and quadruple-masked for the placebo comparison, included 1,077 participants, and used placebo and open-label active comparators. Its primary measure was a lung-function surrogate rather than a hard clinical outcome, and although the reported PT001 values were numerically higher than placebo, whether the prespecified primary comparison was statistically significant is not stated.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol's landscape · PT001's landscape