Head-to-head evidence
efpeglenatide vs liraglutide
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Type 2 Diabetes
Shared mechanism: GLP-1 receptor · full Type 2 Diabetes pipeline
efpeglenatide
Developed by Hanmi Pharmaceutical and partners
NCT03353350 · Phase 3 · completed
The trial was randomized, quadruple-blinded, placebo-controlled, and included 406 participants, providing a strong comparative design. However, the primary endpoint was the surrogate measure of HbA1c change, and although the reported changes favored efpeglenatide, statistical significance for the primary comparison was not reported.
Next expected readout: November 2027 · NCT07379333 (registry estimate)
liraglutide · Saxenda / Victoza
Marketed by Novo Nordisk
NCT00318461 · Phase 3 · completed
This was a large (n=1091), randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial with both a placebo-controlled comparison (liraglutide + metformin vs metformin + liraglutide placebo) and an active-controlled comparison (glimepiride + metformin). The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c at week 26, a hard, regulator-accepted outcome for type 2 diabetes. The prespecified primary comparisons for liraglutide 1.2 mg and 1.8 mg/day were met: both were significantly superior to metformin alone (p<0.0001) and non-inferior to glimepiride + metformin within the 0.4% margin. The 0.6 mg dose was superior to metformin but did not meet non-inferiority against glimepiride + metformin, which does not negate the positive results for the clinically relevant doses.
Next expected readout: June 2027 · NCT03883412 (registry estimate)
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: efpeglenatide's landscape · liraglutide's landscape