Head-to-head evidence
cagrilintide/semaglutide vs HDG1901
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Type 2 Diabetes
Shared mechanism: GLP-1 receptor · full Type 2 Diabetes pipeline
cagrilintide/semaglutide · CagriSema
Developed by Novo Nordisk
NCT05394519 · Phase 3 · completed
This was a large, randomized, quadruple-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 1,200 patients using percentage body weight change, the standard efficacy measure for obesity treatment. CagriSema reduced body weight by 13.7% versus 3.4% on placebo, a 10.4-percentage-point difference (p<0.001), meeting the primary endpoint.
Next expected readout: June 2027 · NCT07817251 (registry estimate)
HDG1901
Developed by Hangzhou Zhongmei Huadong Pharmaceutical
NCT06739044 · Phase 3 · completed
The trial randomized 494 participants to HDG1901 or active Ozempic treatment, but neither participants nor investigators were blinded. Its primary endpoint was change in HbA1c, a surrogate measure, and the registry does not report whether the comparison met its objective, supporting a moderate evidence grade.
Caveat: source is secondary industry coverage that does not cite the trial registry number; attribution rests on sponsor/program match only.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: cagrilintide/semaglutide's landscape · HDG1901's landscape