Head-to-head evidence
BPI-361175 vs Icotinib
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Shared mechanism: EGFR · full Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer pipeline
BPI-361175
Developed by Betta Pharmaceuticals Co.
NCT05329298 · Phase 1/2 · status unknown
This is an open-label, non-randomized phase 1/2 dose-escalation and expansion study in which every participant received BPI-361175 with no placebo or active comparator, and no blinding was used. Results have not been posted, and because the design never included a controlled comparison, it cannot demonstrate a controlled treatment effect regardless.
Icotinib
Developed by Betta Pharmaceuticals Co.
NCT01040780 · Phase 3 · completed
This was a randomized, quadruple-blind, active-controlled trial with 200 participants assigned to icotinib and 199 to gefitinib, and its primary endpoint was the clinical measure of progression-free survival. Although the reported median favored icotinib, the statistical significance of the primary comparison is not stated, so the result is unclear rather than definitively positive.
Next expected readout: December 2030 · NCT06955325 (registry estimate)
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: BPI-361175's landscape · Icotinib's landscape