Head-to-head evidence
BI 1569912 vs Blixeprodil
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Major Depressive Disorder
Shared mechanism: NMDA receptor · full Major Depressive Disorder pipeline
BI 1569912
Developed by Boehringer Ingelheim
NCT06280235 · Phase 2 · completed
The study was randomized, quadruple-blind, placebo-controlled, and included 243 participants, using the clinical MADRS depression score as its primary endpoint. However, the prespecified primary dose-response analysis was not statistically significant, so the trial provides well-controlled but inconclusive evidence of benefit.
Blixeprodil
Developed by Gilgamesh Pharmaceuticals
NCT06309277 · Phase 2 · completed
The study was randomized, quadruple-blind, placebo-controlled, and included 46 participants, but the primary endpoint was treatment-emergent adverse-event incidence rather than an efficacy endpoint. The registry reports adverse-event counts but no statistical comparison for this primary endpoint, so whether it was met is unclear; the depression-rating result was a statistically significant secondary finding.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: BI 1569912's landscape · Blixeprodil's landscape