Head-to-head evidence
Asenapine vs Paliperidone palmitate (Invega Hafyera)
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Schizophrenia
Shared mechanism: Dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT2A receptors (antagonist) · full Schizophrenia pipeline
Asenapine
Marketed by AbbVie and partners
NCT00212784 · Phase 3 · completed
This 52-week trial randomly assigned 1,225 people with schizophrenia to asenapine or to olanzapine, with participants, carers, investigators and outcome assessors all unaware of assignment. The primary measure was change in total PANSS symptom score. Asenapine improved symptoms by 21.0 points against 27.5 points for olanzapine, a difference favouring olanzapine at p<0.0001, so asenapine was less effective than its active comparator on this measure.
Next expected readout: December 2027 · NCT07047651 (registry estimate)
Paliperidone palmitate (Invega Hafyera)
Marketed by Johnson & Johnson
NCT03345342 · Phase 3 · completed
After an open-label stabilization phase, 702 participants were randomized to six-month or three-month paliperidone palmitate and treated double-blind with matching injections, including placebo injections to preserve masking. The primary endpoint was the clinical outcome of time to relapse, but the registry reports that the median was not estimable in either group and does not provide a p-value or confidence interval, so the result cannot be classified as clearly met or missed.
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: Asenapine's landscape · Paliperidone palmitate (Invega Hafyera)'s landscape