Head-to-head evidence

Anti-CD33 CAR T-cells vs Lintuzumab-Ac225

Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Shared mechanism: CD33 · full Acute Myeloid Leukemia pipeline

Anti-CD33 CAR T-cells

Developed by iCell Gene Therapeutics

Phase 1/2 in Acute Myeloid Leukemiabiologic (registry-typed, subtype undisclosed)
Weak signal

NCT01864902 · Phase 1/2 · status unknown

This was a small, single-arm, open-label study with no comparator group, designed primarily to assess safety of this cell therapy in a heavily pretreated leukemia population. Results have not yet been posted.

Next expected readout: September 2028 · NCT05672147 (registry estimate)

Unlock with Research ↗

Lintuzumab-Ac225

Developed by Actinium Pharmaceuticals

Phase 3 in Acute Myeloid Leukemiaradiopharmaceutical
Weak signal

NCT00006045 · Phase 3 · status unknown

This trial tested combination chemotherapy with or without an antibody therapy (lintuzumab) in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia, but the public registry record does not state whether treatment assignment was randomized or blinded, and no outcome measures or results are available, so its design rigor and findings cannot be established from what is provided.

Unlock with Research ↗

The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: Anti-CD33 CAR T-cells's landscape · Lintuzumab-Ac225's landscape