Head-to-head evidence
Ametinib vs Icotinib
Same mechanism, same race: design-graded trial evidence for both assets, with the grading rationale shown. Grades describe the quality of the evidence, never the merits of either security.
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Shared mechanism: EGFR · full Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer pipeline
Ametinib
Developed by Hansoh Pharmaceutical Group and partners
NCT05754736 · Phase 2 · status unknown
This is a single-arm, open-label study with no comparator group, so there is no way to know whether the combination performs better than existing treatments. Results on tumor response and progression-free survival have not yet been posted.
Icotinib
Developed by Betta Pharmaceuticals Co.
NCT01040780 · Phase 3 · completed
This was a randomized, quadruple-blind, active-controlled trial with 200 participants assigned to icotinib and 199 to gefitinib, and its primary endpoint was the clinical measure of progression-free survival. Although the reported median favored icotinib, the statistical significance of the primary comparison is not stated, so the result is unclear rather than definitively positive.
Next expected readout: December 2030 · NCT06955325 (registry estimate)
The full competitive landscape for each asset (every same-race competitor with aligned evidence, sortable) is on the asset pages: Ametinib's landscape · Icotinib's landscape